legeggnog02

Find an Asbestos Litigation Firm That Specializes in Mesothelioma It is recommended to choose a law firm specialized in the field you need assistance with. For instance an attorney who focuses on nothing other than car accidents would not be competent to handle a mesothelioma lawsuit. Attorneys who specialize in asbestos litigation and mesothelioma cases have the knowledge and experience needed to help victims win compensation. They will also be well-versed in the latest asbestos laws and rulings that pertain to asbestos litigation. Levy Konigsberg LLC Levy Konigsberg LLP (LK) is a national asbestos litigation firm with offices located in New York and New Jersey. Its attorneys have won multimillion-dollar settlements and verdicts for mesothelioma patients or asbestos cancer, as well as lead poisoning in New York, California, Georgia, and across the nation. Its lawyers also have experience handling cases involving medical malpractice, product liability, and consumer fraud. Over the past three decades, LK represented victims of asbestos-related diseases and mesothelioma. Their lawyers have secured some of the biggest jury verdicts in history for victims. The firm's mesothelioma lawyers have also been successful in prosecuting several prominent lawsuits that involved corporate wrongdoing and toxic exposure. The firm's mesothelioma lawyers are experienced in pursuing litigation against various companies involved in asbestos manufacturing and distribution. These include a number of large corporations and major construction companies as well as property owners. Additionally, LK has successfully sued asbestos producers in lawsuits involving toxic exposure at military facilities and industrial factories. In addition to representing asbestos victims, the firm also represents clients with different types of personal injury claims. These include those who have been injured in car accidents, accidents and medical negligence. In some instances, the firm represents families who have lost loved ones due to medical negligence. Levy Konigsberg LLP attorneys have won numerous awards, including the Best Lawyer in America award for Personal Injury Lawyers as well as Super Lawyers for Plaintiff Personal Injury. U.S. News & World Report has also ranked them as one of the nation's top mesothelioma law firms. LK has been fighting for justice on behalf of thousands of men, women and children who have been deemed as having asbestos-related diseases. Their clients are mostly residents of Maryland and other states across the country. These patients were exposed to toxic substances while at work and consequently were diagnosed with serious health issues such as mesothelioma lung cancer, and asbestosis. Attorneys at LK are licensed to practice in the states of New York and New Jersey and federal district courts across all 50 states. Bolingbrook asbestos attorney could also be licensed to practice in other states based upon their experience and knowledge of asbestos litigation. Waters Kraus & Paul If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma it is important to locate an attorney who is knowledgeable about the law and can help you obtain the compensation you are due. Waters Kraus & Paul's mesothelioma attorneys have extensive experience and are committed to helping clients get the best possible results. They do not take cases on a quick track and are dedicated to obtaining the maximum amount of damages possible for their clients. The firm is a top law firm that has offices in Dallas, Texas; Los Angeles, California; and Moline, Illinois. Its attorneys represent individuals from all 50 states as well as a variety of nations around the world. They have recovered hundreds of millions in settlements and verdicts on behalf of their clients. They are also dedicated to defending the rights of those who suffer in asbestos litigation, and have served on numerous advisory committees representing asbestos bankruptcy creditors and trustees. Peter Kraus, a founding member of Waters Kraus & Paul, is a specialist in toxic torts as well as pharmaceutical injury and False Claims Act cases. He has tried and ruled in several asbestos, benzene and pharmaceutical cases in state and federal courts across the nation. This includes the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. He has also testified in front of the Texas Legislature and Congress for asbestos victims. In the past, asbestos plaintiffs' companies recruited patients suffering from asbestos-related diseases and then bundled them together to join lawsuits. These tactics were meant to frighten the judicial system and make defendants rip off. Since the adoption of Senate Bill 15 this practice is now largely banned across the country and in Texas. Peter Kraus believes that Garlock Sealing Technologies claims are absurd. He claims that none of the firm's clients concealed anything from Garlock and Garlock's claims are unsubstantiated. The lawyers at Waters Kraus & Paul believe that honesty from their clients is the best way to protect their families and legal rights. Weitz & Luxenberg Mesothelioma victims deserve a firm with the resources, tenacity and experience to secure fair compensation. The national law firm of Weitz & Luxenberg has helped asbestos victims collect billions in verdicts and settlements since its inception in 1986. The firm's 90 lawyers form litigation teams that are known for their smart strategies for negotiation and their swiftness at the bargaining table. They will do whatever they can to bring your case to a swift and a satisfactory conclusion. Mesothelioma can be a devastating disease that can cause severe emotional, physical and financial difficulties for the victims and their family members. Exposure to asbestos can cause this cancer that can spread and cause death for a long time. Many companies knowingly put profits over worker safety, failing to disclose the dangers associated with their products. Those who were exposed to asbestos or worked around it are at a higher risk of developing asbestos-related diseases, including mesothelioma and lung cancer. Workers would often bring asbestos fibers home in their clothing or on their skins, which was then passed to family members. Asbestos-related victims could be entitled to compensation from the companies who exposed them to asbestos. Weitz & Luxenberg has offices in New York and throughout the United States. The firm's lawyers have helped asbestos victims get more than $17 billion in settlements and verdicts. The firm's lawyers are committed to making the process as easy and painless for mesothelioma sufferers as is possible. Asbestos litigation has gained prominence in recent years, and the firm is regarded as a leading expert in this particular area of law. The firm's founders, Perry Weitz and Arthur Luxenberg, have extensive experience in asbestos lawsuits. They also have secured some of the biggest settlements ever seen in mesothelioma litigation history. The firm has a strong New York presence, and one of its first victories was a verdict of $75 million for 36 men who worked at the Brooklyn Navy Yard. In the case the jury awarded a brake technician one of the largest verdicts for a single plaintiff. Venus Burns Leonard Sandoval and Josiah Parker are part of the legal team at Weitz & Luxenberg. They recently secured the $23 million verdict in a trial for James McWilliams. He was an 81-year old steamfitter who contracted mesothelioma. The verdict awarded him $10 million in future medical expenses, and $13 million as compensation for his pain in the past. The team also received $23 in a settlement for five former Jenkins Bros. Shipfitters. Judge Joan Madden consolidated the cases to increase pressure on defendants to settle. Chris Panatier Chris Panatier is an experienced trial lawyer who represents victims exposed to toxic substances. His skills are evident both in the over $150 million verdicts he has won for his clients and in professional recognition by his colleagues. His practice is dedicated to toxic torts. He has vast experience in asbestos litigation and mesothelioma. He also has a wealth of experience in pharmaceuticals, product liability commercial disputes, catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death. Asbestos, a poisonous mineral, can cause deadly illnesses like mesothelioma. The condition typically develops over the years after exposure, and it is difficult to diagnose. Asbestos is exposed in many ways, such as mining, manufacturing and home construction. The majority of asbestos exposure cases occur in the workplace. California has numerous sites that were once filled with asbestos including shipyards and factory structures. Asbestos is frequently found in these sites due to its fire-resistant and insulating properties. In addition, contaminated sites can become breeding areas for dangerous viruses and bacteria. Asbestos can also be found in drinking water and soil. Although the majority of asbestos was removed from the atmosphere in the mid-1980s, asbestos-contaminated sites still pose health risks to the public. The state currently has strict environmental regulations to ensure the safety of residents and workers. Asbestos suits are complicated and you should consult an experienced mesothelioma lawyer. During closing arguments in the Johnson & Johnson talc trial, attorney Chris Panatier used an Ice Cream Shop analogy to reach out to jurors and present his arguments. The creative method allowed him to win a blockbuster verdict. He represented four plaintiffs who claimed J&J talc was the reason of mesothelioma. The jury gave $21.7 Million to Joanne Anderson, her husband and their children who were exposed to asbestos through the baby powder of the company. The jury awarded $4 million as punitive damage. The family also filed suit against J&J's suppliers including Imerys SA and Honeywell International. The verdict was handed down just blocks away from J&J's headquarters. The jury found that the company was aware of asbestos' dangers in the talc it produced but did not warn its customers. The plaintiffs' lawyer, Moshe Maimon of Levy Konigsberg in New York, and associate Christopher Panatier of Simon Greenstone Panatier in Dallas, argued that the company acted “maliciously or reckless disregard” for the safety of plaintiffs.